On Sun, Oct 30, 2005 at 02:20:02AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > Trying to alter patches that have been split up is a PITA. Missed a var > rename > in the patch just sent. :/ Heh, nice timing on the max_fd_limit, beat me in sending it by 46 seconds :)
Personally... for a change like what you're introducing into portage_exec, I prefer a single patch. Chunked patched make sense depending on a somewhat subjective grouping; in this case, familiar with the underlying code so interpretting it all is possible, but if it were any other source I would've resorted to applying the series, then diffing between svn and the changes. Your call really, since you're generating the patch(es). ~harring
pgpMSl4Vf0rQS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
