On Monday 28 November 2005 00:20, Ned Ludd wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 00:15 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > On Monday 28 November 2005 00:01, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > The following untested attached patch removes CDEPEND from ebuild.sh > > > A quick grep -i shows that there is one case of CDEPEND left in > > > pym/portage.py after applying the patch. It's in the auxdbkeys around > > > line 5130. Not sure if that is safe to remove or not. > > > The cache entry for CDEP has been replaced with a blank line to keep > > > the cache format compatible. > > > > The CDEPEND in auxdbkeys is needed, but it won't cause any harm other > > than the extra 10 or 11 bytes added to portage.py. This patch is pretty > > much perfect as it is. :) > > Great. > So it's all in your hands now then I can assume and I don't need to file > a bug? ;-)
Committed. > Anything else pending before .53 hits stable? I don't believe so. I'll give it until Wednesday 12:00 UTC and put it out then if nothing comes up. I don't expect anything to, but I'm having a couple of whiskeys atm before bed and will be heading out to a drinking establishment tomorrow... ;) > You know I can be somewhat impatient and I'm ready to get started on > making patches for .54 As are we all. However, the wait seems to be doing good. While trunk is has been reopened for a while, the only things that have gone in have been in testing outside of trunk for a while which has improved quality greatly. Given people's expectations of what 2.0.54 should be I'm not sure of what will happen with 2.1/2.2. However, given the quality that trunk currently has it might be best to split off a branch and lock down the changes in 2.0.54 as soon as the first _pre is released. As far as I know, everything I listed in my last email to the ".53, .54.." thread have existing tested patches so we can probably get a 2.0.54 up to where 2.0.53 is now in half the time... -- Jason Stubbs -- [email protected] mailing list
