I'm baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaack. At least for a bit, wireless in the hotel- should have an apt in the next few days, plus starting new work, offline till connection is available in new place. Meanwhile, hotel through sunday, so probably online/available sporadically during that time frame.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:55:43AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: <snip previous version/symbolic names of branches discussion> > Yep, it makes more sense now. I'd really prefer to chalk it up as a fumble > though and just make sure it doesn't happen again rather than letting it > waterfall. Thinking about what Brian was saying, perhaps the best name for > the time being would be 2.0.20051210? Not huge for YYYYMMDD for releases, assuming that's referenced _only_ as a snapshot developmental release, or... If final release is not 2.1, fine, make it 2.2 (really don't care, although I've levelled my points why 2.1 is what should be used). Either way, decision next few days, rather then indeciveness sounds _really_ nice ;) At this point, don't particularly care what we call it in the branch nor release wise- just care that users get access to it in a release form. :) ~harring
pgpx7Y67VpuA0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
