On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 02:12:59PM -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> Index: pym/portage.py
> ===================================================================
> --- pym/portage.py    (revision 2472)
> +++ pym/portage.py    (working copy)
> @@ -2791,6 +2791,29 @@
>          not fetch(fetchme, mysettings, listonly=listonly, 
> fetchonly=fetchonly):
>               return 1
>  
> +     # inefficient.  improve this logic via making actionmap easily 
> searchable to see if we're in the chain of what
> +     # will be executed, either that or forced N doebuild calls instead of a 
> single set of phase calls.
> +     if mydo not in ("setup", "clean", "postinst", "preinst", "prerm") or 
> "noauto" in features:
Bleh, pardon, old patch, that actually should be 
if mydo not in ("setup", "clean", "postinst", "preinst", "prerm") and (mydo == 
"unpack" or "noauto" not in features):

Time for caffeine /me thinks...
~harring

Attachment: pgpiKqgekRwjh.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to