On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:04:20 +0000 Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:31:25 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | Right now 'emerge action' and 'emerge --action' are both supported. > | But as we learned with the rsync case 'emerge action' has potential > | namespace conflicts with 'emerge package' I'd propose to deprecate > | 'emerge action' before we hit another real conflict. > | (The alternative would be to deprecate 'emerge package' in favor of > a | to-be-written 'emerge install <package>', but that's even more > | problematic) > | Technically it's a no-brainer, only potential problem would be user > | confusion. > | Any objections against this for pre5? > > Mmm, is this taking advantage of Daniel no longer being able to revert > it? :) Heh, almost forgot why the code has been commented for ages ;) Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
