-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Simon Stelling wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: >> What do people think about adding userpriv and usersandox to >> make.globals FEATURES? I've been using these for a long time and >> haven't had any trouble with them. Are there any arguments against >> making them default? > > I didn't verify this personally, but a few days ago mkay came to > #g-portage and asked whether FEATURES='usersandbox -sandbox' resulting > in sandbox enabled is expected behaviour or not. Before we add > usersandbox to the default FEATURES we should make sure that -sandbox > always disables sandbox.
Yeah, we should fix that. In fact, usersandbox seems like a redundant feature to me. Can we deprecate usersandbox and recommend "sandbox" as the sole means of toggling sandbox on and off (whether userpriv is enabled or not)? Zac -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFEOrHs/ejvha5XGaMRApNiAKCUkza2rTSmG0d51OlUsEN++xexaACeNKnl X03PHolSFdQzrV7iglO70Pg= =9QWG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
