On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 17:18:44 -0700 Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2006-12-06 at 18:58 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > > Brian wrote: > > > Did I understand it wrong or did they get this mixed up in the GWN > > > announcement: > > > > > > /etc/portage/package.unmask/kde, /etc/portage/package.unmask/xorg > > > > > > Shouldn't it be: > > > > > > /etc/portage/kde/package.*, /etc/portage/xorg/package.* > > > > You understood it wrong. /etc/portage/package.unmask/foo is correct. > > > > -- > > Andrew Gaffney > > Thanks. I'm glad now I didn't have the time to add that to porthole > yet. Might have been a quick fix anyway though.
Haven't looked at porthole code, but if you use portage_util.grab* the fix is trivial (just add a recursive=1 parameter). Marius -- Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub In the beginning, there was nothing. And God said, 'Let there be Light.' And there was still nothing, but you could see a bit better.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
