-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Marius Mauch wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:38:48 -0800
> Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Since portage-2.2 isn't quite ready yet due to ongoing work in
>> package sets and preserve-libs, and I don't want ongoing work to
>> hold back other features that are stable, I'm planning to split a
>> 2.1.6 branch from trunk. This branch will have package sets and
>> preserve-libs support disabled.
> 
> Disabled as in FEATURES="-preserve-libs" and an almost empty
> sets.conf, or disabled as in "remove all traces from the code"?

I think the relevant APIs should be made private so that people
won't write code that relies on them, and things like sets.conf and
/var/lib/portage/world_sets should be completely disabled so that
people won't rely on them either.

- --
Thanks,
Zac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkVJ6sACgkQ/ejvha5XGaOZqQCffLU2qPkOfTNEzvXtKw7l4+v6
XVAAoL8hP/xVPk4n9D1/qkoDdktyhutO
=WI9Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to