On Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> What's the below "%n in writable segment detected" bit all about? > Should I worry about it? I saw it once before but have no clue > whether it's portage/emerge itself outputting it (I would guess yes, > QA warning??), or one of the build processes. > > I'm guessing it's a warning from portage's newer parallel jobs > processing that you guys may be interested in (a bug to trace down? > file it?? any other info beyond the below that would be useful? how > to duplicate? etc.) but don't know and obviously haven't the foggiest > how serious it is. But it didn't cause anything to barf, so I > figured it couldn't be too bad. But it's still worrying not knowing > what it is, when it's obviously important enough to break the > parallel jobs enforced backgrounding. > > ~amd64/2008.0/no-multilib, portage-2.2_rc25 (now, previously with a > different _rc) > > Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] > >>> Verifying ebuild manifests > >>> Starting parallel fetch > >>> Emerging (1 of 5) sys-devel/gnuconfig-20090203 > >>> Emerging (2 of 5) sys-apps/sandbox-1.6 > >>> Installing sys-devel/gnuconfig-20090203 > >>> Installing sys-apps/sandbox-1.6 > >>> Emerging (3 of 5) sys-fs/udev-140 > >>> Emerging (4 of 5) sys-apps/coreutils-7.1 > >>> Jobs: 2 of 5 complete, 1 running Load avg: 4.81, > >>> 3.95, > 2.11*** %n in writable segment detected *** > > Thanks! http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257279 -- gcc-porting, http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=257279 by design, by neglect treecleaner, for a fact or just for effect wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
