-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:01:39 +0200
Alexander Berntsen <berna...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 04/04/14 21:36, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > Is there any other bugfixes to go in? I am merging some other
> > patches submitted to the list as well.
> There's my/your/our patch(es) for bug 505944. Any idea on what to do
> about that? No one has offered a better way yet.
>
> - --
> Alexander
>
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. let's do the:
if dep.atom and dep.atom.unevaluated_atom and
dep.atom is not dep.atom.unevaluated_atom:
- --
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=
=k5tB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
