On 01/18/2015 11:58 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sun, 18 Jan 2015 11:38:38 +0100 > Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Default MAKEOPTS job number to (number of CPUs + 1) when it is not >> provided in the ebuild environment. >> >> Suggested-By: Daniel Robbins <drobb...@funtoo.org> >> --- >> pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py | 8 +++++++- >> pym/portage/util/cpuinfo.py | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 pym/portage/util/cpuinfo.py >> > > > looks good, merge please > I realize I'm a little bit late here, but after extensive testing with multiple different schedulers that NUMCPU provides equivalent performance, or even outperforms NUMCPU+1. I think that changes from 1 cpu to NUMCPU is good enough, and we don't need to test thrashing the scheduler.
Thanks, Zero
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
