On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 13:46 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:45:48 +0000 > Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@infinera.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-11-27 at 00:41 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > > > On 11/27/2015 12:24 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > > > On a related note, could not profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set > > > > become default ? > > > > > > For purposes of interoperability, we use PMS to document the standard > > > profile format. So, in order to change the default profile format as you > > > suggest, we would have to change PMS retroactively. Generally, > > > retroactive changes to PMS need to be very well justified in order to be > > > accepted. > > > > hmm, how about in gentoo layout.conf? > > There seems to be additions there so perhaps one can add > > profile-formats = portage-2 profile-set ? > > This will break the two alternative package managers as profile-set is > only implemented in Portage.
What about: # Use thin Manifests for Git thin-manifests = false # Sign Git commits, and NOT Manifests sign-commits = false sign-manifests = false Are these not fairly new too? How could these enter the gentoo repo? What about adding portage-2 now and announce profile-set to be added soon? Jocke
