-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 24/05/16 02:31, Duncan wrote: > No argument with obsolete here, but as long as the option is still > allowed (even if ignored) for backward compatibility, isn't > "deprecated" the usual term? I meant to ask if there is any existing precedent in Portage. "Deprecated" would be my pick as well.
- -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXRBg6AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BzV0QALaoe2bLRVSy1xEzQlj83XvD 48cUerVji6qM1C4+e+fWPrEZ4JOwsXLjYyCOl3K3Oop3vuDaMtaA42eDcZcjczJ5 UeWp3cghzoSigGipFif5IjTNvlgW13vK5FcQ7mED+hWZM8kYfoW8pDv52AzMSAhq VBVF4NuNSkmfBqRl6l1+oVdsV+qBhlhf2JYHVGGb0Fop3VKYFmDDJ537bKUEOJ6+ K9qXZzIqTwqiNTp0rFOjNgJp9qfSLEdspsSNqI7mT+IL302is11PtTS7EtikpIsX ZPYAZYBPf7OzQLvdJozMLeU6nLW8V8gNYizksXj8LHfFdFAQEifvz+jSHA4bf0rQ WyifKCd/c2aVPSSzSE5l9wqrS/uA4S4PKINJGWALQhMrD6NzHa837MdUBnvEzJTP +6Ykq/M+qZmWS2TwIk4z97l4CFiU7QtjityLVJGWDGCNia3ikzFtgWwTmp2jBZaj O3gCulZYfIADKpGlGMXA4i09ZZOp0mf2iczrrXeJdvl8i6Q2sfUV/c1VD8rO/Pfa ZC+nlV2lIDePncfzsaHPRvDSoRThR3Hyk/ApBN/PJJojo3+uLnH4p1VQSb1cTQdi b11p9JlfVz1mCtBnHcH6r5ghL3KwyWjVrHf0dUt69aG6x4klt1TG4LNo9QU/wbX9 J5iMIYMwmyjp+X6Ge6AZ =pynC -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
