-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, 30 May 2016 11:08:03 +0200 Alexander Berntsen <berna...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On 27/05/16 16:26, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > However, this gets bogged down in implementation details and fails > > with musl. > Is it possible to elucidate this a bit more in a paragraph? Right now > it reads a bit like "but this fails because reasons -_o_-", but in the > future it might be nice to know said reasons. > > Patch 1 and 2 look great. Patch 3 looks good to me, but obviously > Michał knows more about this so I'll let him be the judge. > - -- > Alexander > berna...@gentoo.org I agree that all 3 look good, But I would say that the other changes Michal proposed should be their own commit(s). This being the first, the others each adding to it. - -- Brian Dolbec <dolsen> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXTDXCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNUQ3Qzc0RTA4MUNDNzBEQjRBNEFBRjVG QkJEMDg3Mjc1ODIwRUQ4AAoJEPu9CHJ1gg7YBWYP/2iFd7DsDKDwZJtTjUJfWAdJ o4EqXmRtPOom0EIf5etfuiTRIKVAnALo9SeFJtp8nkBkRTcv5sa9IfB8ZKucslgW VwlZCNBbXQIWm/d7zFYWSWw6rm0JM6Yq5hIrQ9R4eaKXZTZfNZUZla1u9LnGYmcs VgNXd7EZ1R5zIxugWlLca5FhoEuNHiSrBQn5Vi9mfkngNAeqd5sl+dHBpfrFJlPs 2a7ia1YXXMe6ZVYWD0QW0Z2NcuZ16/7wkI7GH6qqglXkitP31g4tLlQZsVD9MU9k VggQCcA2wdzyaEmLMBn+qE0Uu0yZ+uhIvFLkkbRVbb33WG9u/P5HC6Eio8m7YGb4 2qywJUiJkmdpOlcpfKdvjUpGa8TKF1UqjlsZWYVB65jmx3g4pCorwd2y3nOJktG3 Qodzm4/b3vaK+qLTmJWXqcQr2nvlj9vaibbrhX6RUhsHtlZJPrujiLv6g7m0wL+W 0rLhWL0J1+rmI+uUjzW62YmE3b6Yc7oAL7PEXLU+/R7vLSMA/Brfy5x/wMgwoMCW MAq53aagDXKO2jWVtHiZ2Dj4AAcl5CmA4Gw5gtEezVnIQNTj/Lcui/p+li2q8N9O RN0uG7xffmSqwbivJCwPUesxKBRDsQMRHk0R2L4VI5CQSrEq8d8vZRNUlf8EGisX ODRF7zi9Uvu7WwjRCk1L =9G6+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
