-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 The patch itself looks OK, but I think that this option is a bad idea and design, and that the extra complexity isn't warranted. I know users have asked for something similar several times, but thankfully the users aren't the developers.
But if you genuinely think this is a good idea, and someone else on the team does too, I won't oppose it. We should make sure that we strongly discourage its usage for regular users. Perhaps your suggested manpage addition already does -- I don't know. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXdkX1AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BYbUQAM6EcIv7/2PpOM/ETY6zlZM3 hHH6X4ZofiMJCaXN+xoppFhJ6+d9851VlMS98r7lTPe4BiMlcjXELkb9ukgHJG2S PJtRRo79MlTIH3WB3q7Se+ZIkvtTjikVLKRQgxir5i6UxXgOZgp0ucYguvtnU2U5 79bAxXaUwbqt7o51FfR42J+xWjlfKl36cKsbkMCthNzTyGD/eX8L6wHjkphPhZ9I hxMdmRKs9eKV6EOIDc5ZP55B3+NBeLo5VXZSylZurrwlkGyFhFFUUnIXRkX/Xod5 3Tgk980KrqDwuhZ1tT7Jug8x+uOHYrugZzL9AW/T91ACp9kut2gXYhXATufHXHT4 6vCm9BCNwqMQh3GkQCVQEhY1P3okFdR1SXZuzjiSpfbzkZjyIJ1o/Vj/X5/gq+SC CWQBgIyoW9hVvIQqHbfnoEewfXhwFpvknl7R8DeWiCZbX462Gjn5dQ4KKZHlQrLk nDtvHKmX6aXC7ElQsRMagZ5HevfcU2h4uYbYorkaipNskMFMeGBT5j85jK3Nu9C9 0XX6GD+djYDd0L4hk0h6Kb30PZu5p5Y9HIQdia0tspwUDsbSsOdJe/vNYQMNy50z Oke0arfNJEY5KfILV5QS1ShkX/2Ot+tZtDsPsEZKMidK5hYZcyeAHQ0MmVLLikkj CtWAcVXmHmOz3HH6tVTY =buhT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
