Hi, thanks for your continuous work, just an implementation detail, it may be possible to avoid a new option reusing the current autounmask one?
instead of --autounmask [ y | n ] --autounmask-only [ y | n ] --autounmask-write [ y | n ] --autounmask-continue [ y | n ] something like: --autounmask [ y | n | only | write | continue] especially if these options make no sense used together 2016-07-01 12:29 GMT+02:00 Alexander Berntsen <berna...@gentoo.org>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > The patch itself looks OK, but I think that this option is a bad idea > and design, and that the extra complexity isn't warranted. I know > users have asked for something similar several times, but thankfully > the users aren't the developers. > > But if you genuinely think this is a good idea, and someone else on > the team does too, I won't oppose it. We should make sure that we > strongly discourage its usage for regular users. Perhaps your > suggested manpage addition already does -- I don't know. > - -- > Alexander > berna...@gentoo.org > https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXdkX1AAoJENQqWdRUGk8BYbUQAM6EcIv7/2PpOM/ETY6zlZM3 > hHH6X4ZofiMJCaXN+xoppFhJ6+d9851VlMS98r7lTPe4BiMlcjXELkb9ukgHJG2S > PJtRRo79MlTIH3WB3q7Se+ZIkvtTjikVLKRQgxir5i6UxXgOZgp0ucYguvtnU2U5 > 79bAxXaUwbqt7o51FfR42J+xWjlfKl36cKsbkMCthNzTyGD/eX8L6wHjkphPhZ9I > hxMdmRKs9eKV6EOIDc5ZP55B3+NBeLo5VXZSylZurrwlkGyFhFFUUnIXRkX/Xod5 > 3Tgk980KrqDwuhZ1tT7Jug8x+uOHYrugZzL9AW/T91ACp9kut2gXYhXATufHXHT4 > 6vCm9BCNwqMQh3GkQCVQEhY1P3okFdR1SXZuzjiSpfbzkZjyIJ1o/Vj/X5/gq+SC > CWQBgIyoW9hVvIQqHbfnoEewfXhwFpvknl7R8DeWiCZbX462Gjn5dQ4KKZHlQrLk > nDtvHKmX6aXC7ElQsRMagZ5HevfcU2h4uYbYorkaipNskMFMeGBT5j85jK3Nu9C9 > 0XX6GD+djYDd0L4hk0h6Kb30PZu5p5Y9HIQdia0tspwUDsbSsOdJe/vNYQMNy50z > Oke0arfNJEY5KfILV5QS1ShkX/2Ot+tZtDsPsEZKMidK5hYZcyeAHQ0MmVLLikkj > CtWAcVXmHmOz3HH6tVTY > =buhT > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > >
