On 07/01/2016 05:45 AM, Francesco Riosa wrote: > Hi, > thanks for your continuous work, just an implementation detail, it may > be possible to avoid a new option reusing the current autounmask one? > > instead of > --autounmask [ y | n ] > --autounmask-only [ y | n ] > --autounmask-write [ y | n ] > --autounmask-continue [ y | n ] > > something like: > --autounmask [ y | n | only | write | continue] > > especially if these options make no sense used together
That's an interesting idea, but my experience is that boolean options lead to simpler code, so I would prefer to stick with booleans. -- Thanks, Zac
