On 08/12/2017 12:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> Like --autounmask-keep-masks, it can be useful to prevent --autounmask
> from creating other kinds of changes:
> * keywords
> * license
> * use
> In order to prevent changes to keywords, should we be consistent with
> --autounmask-keep-masks, and call the option --autounmask-keep-keywords?
> Other ideas?
> See:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622480
> https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/187

Should --autounmask-keep-keywords be independent of
--autounmask-keep-masks, so that it's possible to accept unmask changes
and reject keyword changes? Maybe it's not a very useful distinction in
practice, but making them independent seems cleaner in some ways.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to