On 08/12/2017 12:57 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > Like --autounmask-keep-masks, it can be useful to prevent --autounmask > from creating other kinds of changes: > > * keywords > * license > * use > > In order to prevent changes to keywords, should we be consistent with > --autounmask-keep-masks, and call the option --autounmask-keep-keywords? > > Other ideas? > > See: > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622480 > https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/187 >
Should --autounmask-keep-keywords be independent of --autounmask-keep-masks, so that it's possible to accept unmask changes and reject keyword changes? Maybe it's not a very useful distinction in practice, but making them independent seems cleaner in some ways. -- Thanks, Zac
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
