W dniu pon, 06.11.2017 o godzinie 08∶44 -0800, użytkownik Zac Medico
napisał:
> On 11/06/2017 07:27 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > @@ -148,15 +147,21 @@ class Manifest(object):
> > self.pkgdir = _unicode_decode(pkgdir).rstrip(os.sep) + os.sep
> > self.fhashdict = {}
> > self.hashes = set()
> > + self.required_hashes = set()
> >
> > if hashes is None:
> > hashes = MANIFEST2_HASH_DEFAULTS
> > + if required_hashes is None:
> > + required_hashes = hashes
> >
> > self.hashes.update(hashes)
> > self.hashes.difference_update(hashname for hashname in \
> > list(self.hashes) if hashname not in
> > get_valid_checksum_keys())
> > self.hashes.add("size")
> > - self.hashes.add(MANIFEST2_REQUIRED_HASH)
> > +
> > + self.required_hashes.update(required_hashes)
> > + self.required_hashes.intersection_update(self.hashes)
> > +
>
> Requiring that presence of digests for all manifest-hashes can be
> problematic, because when we extend manifest-hashes it means that nobody
> can regenerate a particular manifest without fetching *all* distfiles
> referenced in the Manifest. It's much more friendly if we generate the
> missing digests when the distfiles happen to be available in DISTDIR,
> which is how the portage currently behaves.
This doesn't change. The intersection only strips away hashes that are
not in 'self.hashes'.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
