Dnia 11 stycznia 2018 07:54:40 CET, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org>
napisał(a):
>On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org>
>wrote:
>> W dniu śro, 10.01.2018 o godzinie 21∶45 -0500, użytkownik Mike
>Gilbert
>> napisał:
>>> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:56 PM, Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org>
>wrote:
>>> > On 01/10/2018 02:24 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> > > Enable repoman checks on exp profiles by default to improve
>>> > > the dependency graph integrity on those profiles and help them
>on their
>>> > > way towards stable status. This is possible now that the
>dependency
>>> > > graph problems are warnings rather than errors.
>>> > > ---
>>> > > repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py | 2 +-
>>> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> > >
>>> > > diff --git a/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py
>b/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py
>>> > > index f32972288..d49147366 100644
>>> > > --- a/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py
>>> > > +++ b/repoman/pym/repoman/argparser.py
>>> > > @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ def parse_args(argv, qahelp,
>repoman_default_opts):
>>> > >
>>> > > parser.add_argument(
>>> > > '-e', '--include-exp-profiles', choices=('y',
>'n'), metavar='<y|n>',
>>> > > - default=False,
>>> > > + default='y',
>>> > > help='include exp profiles in dependency checks')
>>> > >
>>> > > parser.add_argument(
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > We have dev and exp profiles disabled by default because the time
>>> > consumed by repoman is proportional to the number of profiles.
>>> >
>>> > The current counts are as follows:
>>> >
>>> > stable 87
>>> > dev 88
>>> > exp 149
>>>
>>> Yeah, I really don't like the idea of making repoman even slower by
>default.
>>
>> The alternative is to go for all profiles being stable. Because
>> accepting developers randomly breaking profiles 'because repoman
>speed'
>> is not acceptable.
>
>I disagree. Many of these are profiles that are seldom used and very
>few users are affected by any breakage.
>
>There's a balance to be struck here, and I think it's pretty good
>right where it is.
Just to be clear, the current counts are irrelevant. The goal is to have a
second status that covers profiles on their way to becoming stable. This patch
is part of that thread.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny (by phone)
