On 16 Jan 2018 23:32, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:46 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > Some ebuilds are a bit hard to fix their use of the network in src > > phases, so allow them to disable things. This allows us to turn off > > access by default and for the vast majority while we work out how to > > fix the few broken packages. > > If we are going to allow network sandboxing to be disabled in > individual ebuilds, we should also allow the other sandboxes to be > disabled for the same reasons. sys-apps/sandbox has been notoriously > buggy, for example.
that sandbox can already be disabled dynamically in ebuilds as needed. i don't really see a reason for it to be a RESTRICT value. -mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature