On 18/02/18 16:28, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 13:18:03 +0000
> "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.ever...@iee.org> wrote:
>> Might I suggest breaking out checks into a separate module? I think
>> that hard-coding it all is likely to become a pain as time goes on,
>> more checks get added, etc  ...
> So, you would like the commit message checks to be  a plug-in system
> like the ebuild checks are now.
> Yes that is possible,  that would also allow overlays and sub-distros
> to customize it to their liking.  But you do realize it would be a
> module system with only the one plug-in.  It would add a slight amount
> of overhead and subsequently a tiny bit more time.  Although it is not
> much as I remember when I first developed the plug-in system for emaint.
> I will consider that for the stage3 work in progress, but for the
> master branch of repoman, the hard-coded version above would be fine.
That's probably a better implementation, but for the time being I was
thinking more of an 'actions_commit' module to break out the extra code
from the generic 'actions' module.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to