Thank you very much Zac for your answers. I was wondering if I was missing any coding convention after reading [1], since I always follow the pattern to define eclasses inside my overlays as needed, sometimes overriding those provided from gentoo portage. I was not sure if I was doing the development breaking the expected QA rules.
With your explanation I know now that I'm doing it the right way. [1] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/common-problems/index.html#qa-notice----eclass-foo-inherited-illegally
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
