On Wed, 2020-06-17 at 10:18 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 16 Jun 2020, Michał Górny wrote:
> > '/usr/bin/env python' (with no extra options) is the portable shebang.
>
> I still think this is a gross hack. You want your script to use the
> correct interpreter (which is in /usr/bin, or the path substituted for
> it at install time), not some random binary which happens to be found
> in the user's ${PATH}.
> How do you presume what the correct interpreter is, and why do you presume that users put 'random binaries' in their PATH? What if the user needs to override 'correct interpreter'? Requiring people to overwrite executables in /usr/bin sounds like a 'gross hack'. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
