On 6/30/20 10:29 AM, Sid Spry wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:34 PM, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 6/29/20 7:15 PM, Sid Spry wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2020, at 9:13 PM, Sid Spry wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have some runnable pseudocode outlining a faster tree verification >>>> algorithm. >>> >>> Ah, right. It's worth noting that even faster than this algorithm is simply >>> verifying >>> a .tar.xz. Is that totally off the table? I realize it doesn't fit every >>> usecase, but it >>> seems to be faster in both sync and verification time. >> >> We've already got support for that with sync-type = webrsync. However, I >> imagine sync-type = git is even better. All of the types are covered here: >> >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Portage_Security > > I'm being warned right now that webrsync-gpg is being deprecated; I've been > using > it. It is, amazingly, faster than a typical rsync and may be faster than a > git pull though.
Yeah webrsync-gpg is deprecated but the replacement is sync-type = webrsync and verification is enabled by default for that sync-type. -- Thanks, Zac
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
