Yes, it turns out that is the problem! The router somehow got
misconfigured as 0.0.0.0 instead of 10.0.1.1.
here is ifconfig:
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:00:00:00:00:00
BROADCAST MASTER MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
dummy0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 86:DB:59:06:1D:3C
BROADCAST NOARP MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:03:93:80:24:F2
inet addr:10.0.1.200 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:16 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1374 (1.3 Kb) TX bytes:1174 (1.1 Kb)
Interrupt:41 Base address:0x7400
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:30:65:16:B7:DD
inet addr:10.0.1.12 Bcast:10.255.255.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:22 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:20 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
RX bytes:1910 (1.8 Kb) TX bytes:3002 (2.9 Kb)
Interrupt:57
lo Link encap:Local Loopback
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1
RX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
TX packets:4 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
RX bytes:280 (280.0 b) TX bytes:280 (280.0 b)
and route -n:
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window
irtt Iface
10.0.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth0
10.0.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0
0 eth1
loopback localhost 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0
0 lo
Is the right command to use 10.0.1.1 as a router (for both eth1 and
eth0) 'route add default gw 10.0.1.1'? Or is it something else? That is
what I got from manning route, but I don't what to mess anything up by
having conflicting IP addresses.
thanks
nick
On Sep 22, 2005, at 4:29 AM, Matti Bickel wrote:
Nicholas S-A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The output is actually this error from 'man connect':
[ENETUNREACH] The network isn't reachable from this host.
Since you can reach your router: have you checked *which* interface
reaches the router?
What's the output of route -n?
Sorry, just a wild guess.
Matti
--
--
gentoo-ppc-user@gentoo.org mailing list
