Dnia 2014-10-29, o godz. 16:21:20 Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> napisał(a):
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Dnia 2014-10-29, o godz. 14:39:52 > > Ian Stakenvicius <a...@gentoo.org> napisał(a): > > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >> Hash: SHA256 > >> > >> On 29/10/14 02:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> > > >> > This is ugly. > >> > > >> > I was rather thinking of making all eclasses put +impl in IUSE when > >> > only one implementation is supported. > >> > > >> > >> ...how would that work? PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET as set in make.conf > >> overrides the +impl in IUSE. > > > > Does it? > > > > Yes, it does. > > Personally, I would prefer to remove PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET from > profiles and have all python-single-r1 ebuilds set a +impl in IUSE. > Just need a reasonable algorithm for determining what that impl should > be. Indeed it does. However, profiles don't seem to affect +flag for me. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
