On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <[email protected]> wrote: >> dev-python/pathlib >> dev-python/pyutil >> dev-python/zbase32 >> dev-python/zfec > > Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes > on the first one, not sure about context on the rest. >
Agreed on pathlib. The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs. I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree uses these.
