On Monday 21 January 2008, Alec Warner wrote: > On 1/21/08, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 21 January 2008, Alec Warner wrote: > > > On 1/21/08, Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > So, I have been thinking about the slacker system as well. Here's > > > > > what I think we should be starting with as our plan to get back on > > > > > our feet: > > > > > > > > > > * Clear out the QA bugs. We have several bugs that are assigned > > > > > to us, or have us CC'd. We should do something with these, not all > > > > > are difficult, but require a few people doing some work. > > > > > * Get some sort of meetings or discussions going on the mailing > > > > > list, and figure out a system to ensure that everyone on the team > > > > > meets criteria we decide upon for them to be considered active. * > > > > > Poll the user and dev communities to find out what they see as our > > > > > biggest QA issues. After we get those, we can prioritize them and > > > > > find out which are even solvable. > > > > > > > > > > That's all I have for now...there are lots and lots of other things > > > > > we can start to work on as well, but I think these should be our > > > > > focus to start with. > > > > > > > > So, its been several days now. Is anyone else interested in the QA > > > > lead position besides myself? How do my plans above sound? > > > > > > They sound like crap; but crap is better than what we have right now. > > > > could you elaborate at all ? > > The crap smells too, is that enough?
wanker :p -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
