LaTex? Maybe if there are *two* of us, the gang at TeXmacs will fix their R embedded session bug! :)
Seriously, though, TeXmacs supposedly will start an R session and incorporate it into the document you're working on. However, this doesn't work for R 2.0.0 or later; the R people changed the way they handle packages/libraries and TeXmacs didn't change their code to work with it. Time for me to bug (pun intended) the TeXmacs R person again. And ... I'm testing R 2.1.1 under Gentoo (and Fedora :(( ) even as we speak. Believe it or not, it compiled and passed "make check-all" on FC4-test3 using gcc 4.0.0. R 2.1.1 is due out 20 June and they're down to the corner cases -- Solaris, etc. -- in their testing. The easy stuff (x86) is probably fine. You might want to join the Rd mailing list if you're associated with x86-64; 64-bit R is still quite active, I think. Marcus D. Hanwell wrote: >On Sunday 12 June 2005 03:02, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > > >>One other trick -- if you want to plot full pages with multiple plots, >>for example "two-up" or "six-up" plots, have a look at the "screen" >>function. >> >> > >Thanks for all the tips - this is just the stuff I was hoping for. I now have >much better looking plots and it looks like I should be able to use R for all >my analysis and plotting. I sorted the mu out too - one of the reasons I >wanted R was also its ability to typeset LaTeX like mathematical notation. > >This is all stuff that will get embedded in LaTeX documents - I don't use Word >unless I am absolutely forced to do so... R does seem to be working pretty >well so far though, and it is really helping me crunch through these numbers. > >Many thanks, > >Marcus > >P.S. Did I mention I have marked R-2.1.0-r1 stable on amd64 and x86? It is >working great on both and has no reported bugs open. > > -- [email protected] mailing list
