On Sunday 21 August 2005 7:43 am, Peter Bienstman wrote: > Hi, > > I've been looking through the tree to see which packages use lapack/blas, > and which of them are prepared for the new infrastructure. There are > actually far less packages than I anticipated: > > Still depends on old infrastructure: > > sys-cluster/hpl > > Already uses virtual/blas or virtual/lapack in unstable branch: > > dev-lang/R > sci-geosciences/grass > sci-misc/camfr > sci-chemistry/mpqc > sci-mathematics/octave > sci-misc/xfoil > > Uses own code, but could benefit from transition: > > dev-python/numeric (see http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81520)
I use numeric and scipy, and have been trying for a long time to improve the ebuilds to use blas/lapack/atlas. I submitted an ebuild for numeric six months ago (http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81520), but it has languished in buzilla because it is not clear how to deal with ATLAS (my atlas USE flag was rejected). How should ATLAS dependencies be handled in the new infrastructure? -- Darren S. Dale Bard Hall Department of Materials Science and Engineering Cornell University Ithaca, NY. 14850 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.ccmr.cornell.edu/~dd55/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
