On AD 2008 February 07 Thursday 07:07:24 AM -0800, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote: > "Modeling" is too vague a word to get a meaningful response. However, I'll > assume that, since it's astrophysics, that you're solving some equations. > There are two ways to solve equations, numeric and symbolic. You can also > mix these approaches, although that's more difficult.
The equation solving is pretty easily done by hand so far. > So ... can you specify the nature of the model? Is it equation-based? > Numerical? Symbolic? Algebraic? Integral? Differential? None of the above? This is the part I don't quite understand. Maybe I should ask my advisor and then I can come back with a more specific question, but in the movies modeling usually consists of a fancy full color 3D graphical simulation with sound effects. :-) Justin -- [email protected] mailing list
