-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 15 May 2008 18:24:35 +0700 (NOVST) "Andrey G. Grozin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose *not* to use an external liborigin in qtiplot. Am I right > that liborigin is used only by qtiplot? Then it would be better to > get rid of sci-libs/liborigin at all. It seems veru unlikely that > anybody else (except qtiplot) will want it. And qtiplot always > contains its own, newest and customized source of liborigin. If a > uswer cares for Origin compatibility, he will be better off with this > version. At least sci-visualization/labplot uses liborigin, and someone could want to use liborigin for its own use. Internal copies are harmful and best avoided. The best solution is ususally to work out with upstream to try to remove it. - -- Sébastien -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkgut8MACgkQ1ycZbhPLE2CCDgCeKs2l0RMuSg8xlhni3hZatNGY YikAmwSEitdIs7wcp/w2X4sfxTdTYX4B =9Hrr -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
