Henry Gebhardt wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Justin schrieb:
>>> Henry Gebhardt schrieb:
>>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Henry Gebhardt schrieb:
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Justin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> Justin schrieb:
>>>>>> (...)
>>>>>>> But I hit some bad thing, I am working alot with branches and noted that
>>>>>>>  the .git dir growths and growths, although I removed the branches. Can
>>>>>>> I clean this up?
>>>>>> Yes! Collect all the garbage with
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ git gc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ~Henry
>>>>>>
>>>>> but that doesn't really shrink the size.
>>>> That's weird. How big is it getting? (Mine is 4.1 MB)
>>>>
>>> 150mb adn it shrinked with git gc --agressive down to 120mb.
> 
> Now that is indeed a bit excessive.
> 
>>> What I did was pulling other overlays as branch, doing an filterbranch
>>> and only merging certain thing. perhaps this is something different than
>>> branching the repo itself.
>>>
>> and of course deleted the branches afterwards
>>
> 
> Hm, I've never used git filter-branch before, but according to the
> manpage the original branches are still stored in .git/refs/original,
> so git gc wouldn't remove the objects they reference. Also, there
> might still be a reference in .git/refs/remotes. (Possibly
> 
> $ git branch -a
> 
> will show all of them to you (definitely the remote ones).)
> 
> Hope that helps.
> 
> ~Henry
> 

yeah I deleted all branches, in branch -a there is only the local master
and the the origin/master.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to