François Bissey wrote: > Hi, > > We have virtuals for blas, cblas and lapack. At the moment there is only > one package with a clapack implementation in the tree and one in the > science overlay. These two are the only one I could find with a quick search. > > With the sage development there is at least one package that depends > on a clapack implementations. So should we plan for a virtual/clapack? > > Francois >
Just find out whether there more packages which can provide an equal implementation for clapack. If so a virtual package would make sense, but only then.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
