Hi Sébastien, Thanks for the nice summary of the current state of affairs.
> > We also need to know whether we still want a leader. Some time ago > the question was raised, but got no definite answer. I think if we decide that we want a leader we should clearly define what we expect her/him to do. We're a very diverse bunch and the packages in science.g.o span a wide range of fields so I am not 100% convinced that a lead will necessarily be very effective. On the other hand, there are a few things that definitely need improvement, documentation and eclasses being some candidates here, and it might be nice to have somebody who feels responsible and coordinates/delegates a bit. I'd probably need a nudge once in a while ;) > * Documentation: > We need to revamp our project documentation. I started some doc in > our overlay [1] long time ago, but feel free to update, propose > patches or rewrite it entirely if you don't like it. Denis had some > electronics docs in his site, so we could also merge it. A wiki would > be very nice, but first it would be worth checking how many people are > actually using Gentoo for science. Better docs are definitely something we need. It would probably be good to either have a dev or maybe one of our users assess and then coordinate this a bit. cheers, Markus -- -- Markus Dittrich (markusle) Gentoo Linux Developer Scientific applications
pgpaGNRJA1Yy5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
