> On 06/30/2010 10:51 AM, François Bissey wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> The way that sage depends on lapack and numpy is broken at the moment. > >> Can somebody look at bug 320669 ? > >> At least here on x86 it is not possible to get a working sage at the > >> moment. Let me know if there is anything I can test or do. > > > > this is a bit more subtle than that Thomas. I have 2 x86 machines, > > one with problems and one without. Christopher doesn't have problems > > on his x86 machine either. > > Why is this bug not affecting amd64? > > Now I'm curious about lapack and friends. It seems that atlas is the > current way to go for sage, but I found that in various places > "reference" is eselected on my system. > Can somebody with a working system post a list of which implementations > should be eselected for which package? > Maybe someone should update this here too: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/science/blas-lapack.xml > After checking there is currently only one place where we have made a hard requirement on atlas and that is in sage-core where we ask for lapack-atlas. I have removed the code eselecting lapack-atlas a few days ago. If you can test that everything build with reference (you may have to edit the ebuild) I may make that dependency into virtual/lapack instead. Have you built linbox with blas/cblas/lapack reference as well?
Cheers, Francois
