> EL Sat, 4 Jun 2011 12:15:18 +1200 > > ls -la /usr/lib64/libcblas.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 26 2 jun 13:44 /usr/lib64/libcblas.so -> > blas/reference/libcblas.so > > ls -la /usr/lib64/libblas.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 2 jun 13:43 /usr/lib64/libblas.so -> > blas/reference/libblas.so > > ls -la /usr/lib64/liblapack.so > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 2 jun 13:47 /usr/lib64/liblapack.so -> > lapack/reference/liblapack.so > > It looks reasonable to me. It does. Yet your scipy doesn't link to anything blas related according to the output of ldd that you sent. I note you are using numpy-1.6.0 I don't if that's linked to that but sage will not work properly with it: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11334 Can you try again with numpy-1.5.1 at least. And then what are the outputs of: ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/core/_dotblas.so ldd /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/lapack_lite.so
Francois
