Quoting Johan Hattne <[email protected]>:
On 30 Aug 2011, at 12:49, [email protected] wrote:
Hi all,
So I was looking at the science overlay from my prefix on OS X.
And portage wanted me to upgrade my blas/cblas/lapack stack to the
new structure. I know they are marked ~x86 and ~amd64 but it doesn't
look good considering that I had a working stack in my prefix before.
So I may make things a little more prefix friendly (OS X in particular)
in the coming days. I am also thinking of adding an ebuild to use the
native vectorize framework on OS X, unless someone strongly objects to it.
Hi Francois;
With the CBLAS reference implementations, you may run into a problem
with the test suite on Darwin. I tried to sort this out earlier this
year (see
http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/archives/lapack/msg00997.html),
but I'm not even sure upstream recognises the problem. Please let me
know if at least you can reproduce the issue, and then maybe we can
try again to get it fixed.
Looking at that thread they don't seem to see a problem. I haven't tackled
cblas-reference yet but I have made an ebuild to use the vectorize framework
from apple on OS X (I'll put it in the overlay soonish) and the test suite for
lapack-reference totaly failed when built with either blas-reference or
vectorize. I am guessing that it must be similar to what you got with
cblas-reference.
Francois
