On 28/02/13 21:52, Thomas Kahle wrote: > On 10:04 Thu 28 Feb 2013, [email protected] wrote: >> Quoting Thomas Kahle <[email protected]>: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm using the keywordfile from s-o-g, but I seem to need some further >>> unmasks. Is it my fault, or should they be added? >>> >>> #required by dev-python/sympy-0.7.2-r2::sage-on-gentoo[opengl], >>> required by sci-mathematics/sage-5.7-r1::sage-on-gentoo, required by >>> sci-mathematics/sage-notebook-0.10.4-r1::sage-on-gentoo >>> =dev-python/pyopengl-3.0.2-r1 ~amd64 >>> #required by dev-python/wxpython-2.8.12.1-r1[cairo], required by >>> dev-python/ipython-0.13.1-r1::sage-on-gentoo[wxwidgets], required by >>> sci-mathematics/sage-5.7-r1::sage-on-gentoo, required by >>> sci-mathematics/sage-notebook-0.10.4-r1::sage-on-gentoo >>> =dev-python/pycairo-1.10.0-r4 ~amd64 >>> >> Hi Thomas, >> >> I masked ipython-0.13.1-r1 for now. It is a python-r1 migrated ipython >> and we would need to keywords all the dependencies. We just keep it ready. > > The main tree also has an ipythin-0.13.1-r1 which applies to patches > that the s-o-g version does not apply. Maybe that's the problem? >
This must be new patches. I "forked" the sage-on-gentoo" from the main tree 7 days ago. At that time the difference was patches I added based on the spkg shipped in sage (one backport from an unreleased version, the other won't be merged because what it fixes is being revamped). >> pyopengl on the other hand is very curious. It is asked by sympy and >> I specifically didn't depend on python-r1 pyopengl which is what portage >> wants to install here. The output of emerge -puDtv sage could be helpful. > > probably related... > I doubt it but it would be nice. Francois
