On 21/01/14 18:04, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: > * given the number of bugs, we should keep the linking to the reference > names libraries, so we could eselect providers without re-compiling all > reverse dependencies. We could do this in the open sourced providers by > changing the soname of the libraries we compile, and in the binary ones > (mkl,amcl...) with a link script generated library.
I don't get this point. Why do we need to play around with sonames? Doesn't this bring more problems and maintainer burden then letting the consumer recompile reverse dependencies? Are the libs all ABI compatible? Jusitn
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
