Yes, that works. Thanks, Thomas On 31/05/14 13:40, François Bissey wrote: > Well only docutils-0.10 is rotten for sage-doc docutils-0.11 seems to be fine. > I made sure that it is an acceptable dependency in sage-doc but you’ll have to > keyword manually for now. > > Francois > > On 31/05/2014, at 7:52, François Bissey <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Would you happen to have python 3.3 enabled? That would explain why >> sphinx wants to pull a version of docutils 0.10. We currently have trouble >> building sage-doc with docutils 0.10+ which is why it is blocked. >> >> >> Francois >> On 31/05/2014, at 4:57, Thomas Kahle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying sage-6.2 on my mostly stable amd64 system with sage's keyword >>> file. Portage can't resolve a conflict here and --backtrack=32 did not >>> do it either. Any ideas: >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Thomas >>> >>> >>> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled >>> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict: >>> >>> dev-python/docutils:0 >>> >>> (dev-python/docutils-0.10::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled >>> in by >>> >>>> =dev-python/docutils-0.7[python_targets_python2_6(-)?,python_targets_python2_7(-)?,python_targets_python3_2(-)?,python_targets_python3_3(-)?,python_targets_pypy(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_6(-),-python_single_target_python2_7(-),-python_single_target_python3_2(-),-python_single_target_python3_3(-),-python_single_target_pypy(-)] >>> required by (dev-python/sphinx-1.1.3-r7::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) >>> >>> (dev-python/docutils-0.9.1-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by >>> >>> <dev-python/docutils-0.10[python_targets_python2_7(-)?,-python_single_target_python2_7(-)] >>> required by (sci-mathematics/sage-doc-6.2::sage-on-gentoo, ebuild >>> scheduled for merge) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thomas Kahle >>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ >>> >> >> > >
-- Thomas Kahle http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
