03.09.14 09:53, Honza Macháček написав(ла): > On 09/03/2014 02:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: >> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:42:19 Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: >>> ...(e.g. I tried to do >>> version bump for sci-physics/bigdft, but I failed as new version does >>> not compile and error is in fortran code, that I do not understand). >> >> I guess if someone is using it they will complain. Then it can be their >> job to fix it :) > > Fixing sci-physics/bigdft should be my job. I'm only rather slow with that. > Send > any complaints, info or advice to me; I may not respond, and even no > improvements to the ebuild may come up for quite a long time afterwards, but I > will be working on it.
sci-physics/bigdft is not the worst case. ) It only needs only version bump and little ebuild clean up. After of it you'll need to fix compilation failure because compiler complains about using f_malloc and f_free from flib with one of variables. -- Jauhien
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
