Well first emerge penal with “-fno-fat-lto-objects” and inspect libpynac.so for the symbol.
François > On 26/11/2014, at 19:28, François Bissey <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think I will ping pynac upstream to see if they have any idea but I think > it may be a recurring gcc or a subtle abuse of C++. It would be interesting > to see > if putting -fno-fat-lto-objects would with getting the symbol in pynac. There > are > other things ‘i can think off that may work but need to consult upstream and > people who know more c++. > > François > >> On 26/11/2014, at 18:57, Jeramia Poland <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The output of >> >> nm -D /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so | grep >> ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE >> >> is: >> >> U _ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE (with the ZTVN part showing up in red) >> >> The output of >> >> nm -D /usr/lib64/libpynac.so.1.1.0 | grep ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE >> >> is: >> >> (nothing it appears to be missing) >> >> Output of the third command is attached. The -ffat-lto-objects flag should >> be in there. I added after the first couple of packages (like pciutils, >> elfutils, openssh, etc.) wouldn't build to see if it would help so I didn't >> have to use the "no-lto" environment setting from that graphite and lto >> instruction page I referenced earlier. It didn't see to work as I now have >> a package.env file full of no-lto entries. Neither sage nor pynac are no-lto >> entries right now as it appeared to me that they merged. >> >> Jeramia >> >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:43 AM, François Bissey <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I think I have all the logs I can use at the moment. I want the output of the >> following two commands: >> nm -D /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so | grep >> ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE >> >> nm -D /usr/lib64/libpynac.so.1.1.0 | grep ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE >> >> Actually make that 3 commands with the output of >> readelf -d /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so >> >> Also to cross check that I am not missing anything fro your info output, >> I cannot see "-ffat-lto-objects" anywhere in your compilation flags. >> Is this correct? >> >> Francois >> >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:05:42 François Bissey wrote: >>> Hum I am starting to wonder if there are things going on between lot and C++ >>> templates. More professional code may do ok but a lot of the stuff we have >>> in sage may be a bit dubious. Can you send me the penal build log please >>> and for good measure the one for sage. You can do it privately if you don’t >>> want to post big file on the list. >>> >>> I have been free of grading for almost 4 years. My wife is very happy about >>> that. >>> >>> François >>> >>>> On 24/11/2014, at 17:12, Jeramia Poland <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Sorry for the delayed reply, I had a bunch of papers to grade. Yes, it is >>>> installed. Attached are the lld results. Jeramia >>>> >>>> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:20 AM, François Bissey <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: I hate automated spellchecking, I meant pynac not “penal” I >>>> remember turning it off on an iPad after a ludicrous suggestion for >>>> lapack. >>>> >>>> François >>>> >>>>> On 22/11/2014, at 15:33, François Bissey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> I assume penal is installed otherwise >>>> >>>> <lib_link_1.txt><lib_link_2.txt> >> >> >> >> <readelf.txt>
