On 08/04/19 05:17, Mo Zhou wrote [as excerpted]: > Hi list, > > I'm going to participate the gsoc project "BLAS and LAPACK runtime"[1]. > However it seems to pose a significant change on Gentoo Science Team's > packages, so I'd better ask for approval first before really working > on this, in case anybody disagree with the proposal. > > <snip> > The proposed solution involes no usage of USE flag, or eselect feature. > > Objective of this project: > > 1. Integrate update-alternatives mechanism into Gentoo's reference blas, > i.e. netlib blas' packaging. Whilst I'm, by all means, no expert on this; I think when you look into it, you'll find that the eselect and update-alternatives functions are highly equivalent, so you should find it feasible to do the port the other way around, and translate the 'update-alternatives' to 'eselect'. Ideally if you can keep within the frameworks Gentoo already provides, this should make integration and maintenance a little easier!
Otherwise, it sounds like you've got the size of the problem in hand, and I wish you all the best with the project! Best regards, veremitz/Michael.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
