On 10/3/20 5:31 PM, Fosco wrote: > I found the homonym package, but they relate to different areas (genetic > and geography). > > sci-geosciences/grass had an update at least few months ago (my last > check is "late spring"). I remember the ebuild was a couple of minor > version behind the master release. > > My believe is that there were no scheduled removal for that package. > >
I found a log from 2010 commit be508b7888b1d5e4bed1ec07efd9a544a8142b9d Author: Christian Schmitt <[email protected]> Date: Mon Jun 14 13:45:37 2010 +0200 [sci-geosciences/grass] remove the grass version. better one available in portage now So it seems like it has not been in science for a *really* long time. Aisha > Possible tree corruption? > > Fosco > > On 03/10/20 21:17, Aisha Tammy wrote: >> On 10/3/20 2:58 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: >>> On 10/3/20 2:50 PM, Fosco wrote: >>>> Hi all. >>>> >>>> I recently synced and found that sci-geosciences/grass has no available >>>> ebuilds. >>>> >>>> I checked on https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sci-geosciences/grass >>>> and the server returns 404. >>>> >>>> I checked with no luck for a move on https://gpo.zugaina.org/ . >>>> >>>> I didn't notice a "under removal" flag on Grass Gis recently. >>>> >>>> Am I missing something? >>>> >>>> Thank you >> My apologies, seems I misremembered grass as pydap (which I removed) >> >> We still have a package sci-biology/grass present in the tree. >> Perhaps this is the one that you meant? >> >> Aisha >> >>> Yes, grass was removed as it had not been updated in over 3 years. >>> We are currently short of personnel to keep sci clean and update, so >>> we removed the package. >>> >>> If you are interested in having grass present, we would love to get >>> it back with a maintainer, even better if it has been updated upstream. >>> >>> Best, >>> Aisha >>> >> >
