Dnia 2014-10-03, o godz. 20:00:24 Rich Freeman <[email protected]> napisał(a):
> Starting a new thread for discussion: > > On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Michał Górny <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dnia 2014-10-01, o godz. 13:30:55 > > Rich Freeman <[email protected]> napisał(a): > > > >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Rich Freeman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > If you'd like to contribute another agenda item, please reply to this > >> > email. > >> > >> I'll offer up a further topic for the git migration. > > > > I think that there are a few issues that the Council may actually want > > to discuss. > > I was thinking of an additional item also worth consideration. > > So far the general plan has tended to be that we would do a full > historical git migration, and the last commit would just be the active > tree, which would then be further cleaned up (remove cvs headers, > changelogs, switch to thin manifests, etc). > > I was thinking that it might make more sense to just make things > really simple and ONLY migrate the active tree into the starting git > repository. That is, basically take the rsync tree, remove metadata, > and do a git init. (Then follow that up with removing changelogs, > cleaning up cvs headers, and so on.) Not rsync, 'cvs up -dP [-kk]'. rsync has a lot of cruft and out-of-repo experiences. Using cvs directly gives us better guarantees about match between full conversion & snapshot. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
