Eduardo Tongson wrote:
Although a non-issue to servers(?), the change affects sleep call latencies. <http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~ed/misc/nanosleep/> a linux 2.6 @ 100hz is the same as netbsd @ 100hz
It's my understanding that 100hz is best for servers under load. Less context switches whereas moving towards 1000 gives you a more responsive system due to the smaller time slices.
http://kerneltrap.org/node/5411 kashani -- [email protected] mailing list
