Eduardo Tongson wrote: >>>Well, the problem right now is what kind of a route do we want to take? >>>For example, if Gentoo wanted to try and maintain an enterprise ready >>>solution to the stable tree issue, I don't think we could do it. On the >>>other hand, if we wanted to establish a few tools/solutions that provide >>>some enterprise ready functionality, I think we may be able to do that. >> >>Unfortunately I think you're right. While I would like to contribute to the >>maintainance of a stable Portage tree, it is definately beyond what a handful >>of devs can accomplish in the long run. >> >>New docs on the other hand should be a better priority to start out with. >> >> >>>Anyways, I'd love to hear your feedback and opinions! >> >>And I'd love to help with the docs:-) > > > Good to see it's gaining momentum again. Volunteers can probably help > in some way if devs let them know what specifically needs helping.
I looked around a bit and saw we have a sysadmin page [1] talking about various sysadmin type things. At this point I'm wanting to ask you as fellow gentoo server admins, what do *you* want to see on the main Gentoo server site? What is missing now that we need to fill in the gaps? Any specific documentation we should cover? What goals/projects should we look at developing? Do any of you already have some tools developed that maybe we could host/help with? [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/index.xml?catid=sysadmin -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
