On Friday 23 September 2005 03:03, Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen wrote: > On Thursday 22 September 2005 18:27, Lance Albertson wrote: > > Well, the problem right now is what kind of a route do we want to take? > > For example, if Gentoo wanted to try and maintain an enterprise ready > > solution to the stable tree issue, I don't think we could do it. On the > > other hand, if we wanted to establish a few tools/solutions that provide > > some enterprise ready functionality, I think we may be able to do that. > > Unfortunately I think you're right. While I would like to contribute to the > maintainance of a stable Portage tree, it is definately beyond what a > handful of devs can accomplish in the long run. > > New docs on the other hand should be a better priority to start out with. > > > Anyways, I'd love to hear your feedback and opinions! > > And I'd love to help with the docs:-)
Hello, Could some point me to, or provide a more specific breakdown of some of the roles and tasks that would need to be tended to? Forgive me if i appear ignorant to the problems and issues with maintaining an enterprise ready tree but in my mind running a stable tree would involve : 1. Identifiying a version of a package that is stable 2. Marking that package as stable 3. Pushing that package to the rsync servers 4. ? 5. ? 6. ? What are the items that are missing from my list? Cheers Phil -- [email protected] mailing list
